Stringer v. Dortch, Et Ux.

188 So. 590, 136 Fla. 567, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1576
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 3, 1939
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 188 So. 590 (Stringer v. Dortch, Et Ux.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stringer v. Dortch, Et Ux., 188 So. 590, 136 Fla. 567, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1576 (Fla. 1939).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— The bill of complaint herein was dismissed on motion for want of equity for an accounting between appellant and appellee, J. E. Dortch, who had been partners in a bakery business. Complainant appealed. It would serve no useful purpose to quote or discuss at length the allegations, but it will suffice to state that laches to bar relief as between the parties does not clearly appear by the bill, and that the bill of complaint does not wholly fail to state an equity for appropriate relief upon essential proofs under issues made.

Decree dismissing bill of complaint for want of equity is reversed and the cause remanded for appropriate proceedings.

*568 Reversed and remanded.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur. Terrell, C. J., concurs in the opinion and judgment. Justices Buford and Thomas not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sodikoff v. Allen Parker Company
202 So. 2d 4 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
188 So. 590, 136 Fla. 567, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stringer-v-dortch-et-ux-fla-1939.