Stringer v. Car Data Systems, Inc.
844 P.2d 905, 315 Or. 308, 1993 Ore. LEXIS 5
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided January 28, 1993·No. CC A8907-04022; CA A65113; SC S38792·Published·Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
dissenting.
I would allow the petition for reconsideration. I wish to call attention to Note, Exclusivity of Appraisal — The Possibility of Extinguishing Shareholder Claims, 42 Case W Res L Rev 955 (1992), which was not published when my separate opinion in Stringer v. Car Data Systems, Inc., 314 Or 576, 591, 841 P2d 1183 (1992) (Unis, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part, with Fadeley, J., joining), was issued.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stringer v. Car Data Systems, Inc., 844 P.2d 905, 315 Or. 308, 1993 Ore. LEXIS 5 (Or. 1993).
844 P.2d 905 (Stringer v. Car Data Systems, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Deckard v. Bunch
370 P.3d 478 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2016)
Thompson v. Estate of Adrian L. Pannell
29 P.3d 1184 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2001)
Huang v. Claussen
936 P.2d 394 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1997)
Downs v. Waremart, Inc.
926 P.2d 314 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1996)
Marks v. McKenzie High School Fact-Finding Team
878 P.2d 417 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1994)
Marks v. McKENZIE HS FACT-FINDING TEAM
878 P.2d 417 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1994)