Striker v. Bernstein

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Striker v. Bernstein

145 N.Y.S. 998

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedFebruary 13, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 145 N.Y.S. 998 (Striker v. Bernstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Striker v. Bernstein, 145 N.Y.S. 998 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

[1] The respondent’s counsel has attached to his brief an affidavit to which he refers as containing facts in support of the judgment. This practice is entirely unauthorized. The affidavit has not been read by the court, and will be returned to the counsel by the clerk.

[2] The appellant contends that the judgment was contrary to the weight of the evidence. Accepting the testimony of the plaintiff’s witnesses as true, the judgment is supported by the evidence, and should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

[1] The respondent’s counsel has attached to his brief an affidavit to which he refers as containing facts in support of the judgment. This practice is entirely unauthorized. The affidavit has not been read by the court, and will be returned to the counsel by the clerk.

[2] The appellant contends that the judgment was contrary to the weight of the evidence. Accepting the testimony of the plaintiff’s witnesses as true, the judgment is supported by the evidence, and should be affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

145 N.Y.S. 998, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/striker-v-bernstein-nyappterm-1914.