Strikepoint Trading, LLC v. Sabolyk

636 F.3d 524, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 3468, 2011 WL 597029
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 22, 2011·No. 09-56510·Published

Opinion

ORDER

This appeal is DISMISSED as moot.

During oral argument, counsel for Strikepoint Trading, LLC (“StrikePoint”), represented that (1) neither Global Asset Advisors (“GAA”) nor Sabolyk had violated the permanent injunction entered by the district court in this case (which ended in August 2010); (2) Strikepoint would not seek any damages from either Appellant regarding the permanent injunction or the trade secrets claims in the case; and (3) Strikepoint would not seek attorney fees from GAA in this case and, if seeking attorney fees at all, would only seek them from Sabolyk as they relate to the jury verdict of $102,300 for breach of contract.

With such representations by counsel for Strikepoint, counsel for the Appellants agreed the case was moot. A certified copy of this order shall serve as the mandate of this court.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Strikepoint Trading, LLC v. Sabolyk, 636 F.3d 524, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 3468, 2011 WL 597029 (9th Cir. 2011).

636 F.3d 524 (Strikepoint Trading, LLC v. Sabolyk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.