Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe

• Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
• Decided: January 13, 2025
• Docket: 2:24-cv-13378
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Case No. 2:24-cv-13378-MAG-CI ) v. ) ) JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP ) Address 107.143.141.40, ) ) Defendant. ) )

ORDER ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SERVE THIRD PARTY SUBPOENA PRIOR TO A RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Serve A Third Party Subpoena Prior to a Rule 26(f) Conference (the “Motion”), and the Court being duly advised in the premises does hereby: FIND, ORDER AND ADJUDGE: 1. Plaintiff established that “good cause” exists for it to serve a third party subpoena on AT&T Internet (hereinafter the “ISP”). See UMG Recording, Inc. v. Doe, 2008 WL 4104214, *4 (N.D. Cal. 2008); and Arista Records LLC v. Does 1-19, 551 F. Supp. 2d 1, 6–7 (D.D.C. 2008). 2. Plaintiff may serve the ISP with a Rule 45 subpoena commanding the ISP to provide Plaintiff with the true name and address of the Defendant to whom the ISP assigned an IP address as set forth in the Complaint. Plaintiff shall attach to any such subpoena a copy of this Order.

3. Plaintiff may also serve a Rule 45 subpoena in the same manner as above on any service provider that is identified in response to a subpoena as a provider of Internet services to one of the Defendants.

4. If the ISP qualifies as a “cable operator,” as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 522(5), which states: the term “cable operator” means any person or group of persons

(A) who provides cable service over a cable system and directly or through one or more affiliates owns a significant interest in such cable system, or

(B) who otherwise controls or is responsible for, through any arrangement, the management and operation of such a cable system. it shall comply with 47 U.S.C. § 551(c)(2)(B), which states: A cable operator may disclose such [personal identifying] information if the disclosure is . . . made pursuant to a court order authorizing such disclosure, if the subscriber is notified of such order by the person to whom the order is directed.

by sending a copy of this Order to the Defendant. 5. Plaintiff may only use the information disclosed in response to a Rule 45 subpoena served on the ISP for the purpose of protecting and enforcing Plaintiff’s rights as set forth in its Complaint. 6. To ensure "the subscriber is notified of such [an] order," 47 U.S.C. § 551(c)(2)(B), the ISP shall, via certified mail, send notice to the subscriber which

includes a copy of this Order. The ISP shall notify Plaintiff, in writing, of the date on which the notification was mailed to the subscriber. In the event the ISP fails to notify Plaintiff that it has complied with this provision, Plaintiff shall serve a copy

of this Order on the subscriber simultaneous to or before any other service. DONE AND ORDERED this 13th day of January, 2024.

By: s/Mark A. Goldsmith UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE