Strickland v. Winn

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Strickland v. Winn

4 La. App. 7, 1926 La. App. LEXIS 339

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided January 28, 1926·Published

Opinion

MOUTON, J.

This case presents practically the ' same issues which were disposed of by judgment rendered in the suit George Hathaway vs. Hizekia Winn, et al. For the reasons therein assigned, it is ordered and decreed that the judgment of the lower court be hereby increased to the sum of five hundred ($500.00) dollars and as thus amended it be affirmed with cost.

I dissent for reasons assigned in case: Hathaway vs. Winn, this day decided.

(Signed) CLAY ELLIOTT, Judge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MOUTON, J.

This case presents practically the ' same issues which were disposed of by judgment rendered in the suit George Hathaway vs. Hizekia Winn, et al. For the reasons therein assigned, it is ordered and decreed that the judgment of the lower court be hereby increased to the sum of five hundred ($500.00) dollars and as thus amended it be affirmed with cost.

I dissent for reasons assigned in case: Hathaway vs. Winn, this day decided.

(Signed) CLAY ELLIOTT, Judge.

Strickland v. Winn, 4 La. App. 7, 1926 La. App. LEXIS 339 (La. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

4 La. App. 7 (Strickland v. Winn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.