Strickland v. Summers
This text of 210 F. App'x 983 (Strickland v. Summers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Appellant Sylvia Summers (“Summers”) appeals the district court’s denial of qualified immunity and discretionary function immunity from liability for false imprisonment and malicious prosecution. Cross-Appellant, Thomas Strickland (“Strickland”), appeals the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Summers on his false arrest claims.
After reviewing the record, having the benefit of oral argument, and reading the parties’ briefs, we affirm the district court’s judgment on the appeal and cross-appeal based on the district court’s well-reasoned order filed on November 8, 2005.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
210 F. App'x 983, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strickland-v-summers-ca11-2006.