Strickland v. Strickland
This text of 647 S.W.2d 70 (Strickland v. Strickland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
This is an appeal by David Strickland from a divorce decree rendered July 1, [71]*711982. No statement of facts was timely filed and Appellant filed his motion for an extension of time under Rule 21c TRCP, 16 days late. This Court has no authority to consider a late motion for extension of time to file a statement of facts. B.D. Click Co., Inc. v. Safari Drilling Corp., Tex., 638 S.W.2d 860.
Appellant appeals asserting the trial court abused its discretion in 4 particulars.
In the absence of a statement of facts it must be presumed on appeal that the evidence supports the verdict and the judgment of the trial court. Levitz Furniture Co. v. State, (Waco, Tex.Civ.App.) NRE, 471 S.W.2d 452; Englander v. Kennedy, Tex., 428 S.W.2d 806; Giddings v. Simpson, (Waco, Tex.Civ.App.) NWH, 532 S.W.2d 719.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
647 S.W.2d 70, 1983 Tex. App. LEXIS 3841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strickland-v-strickland-texapp-1983.