Strickland v. Strickland

647 S.W.2d 70, 1983 Tex. App. LEXIS 3841
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 20, 1983·No. No. 10-82-114-CV·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by David Strickland from a divorce decree rendered July 1, [71]*711982. No statement of facts was timely filed and Appellant filed his motion for an extension of time under Rule 21c TRCP, 16 days late. This Court has no authority to consider a late motion for extension of time to file a statement of facts. B.D. Click Co., Inc. v. Safari Drilling Corp., Tex., 638 S.W.2d 860.

Appellant appeals asserting the trial court abused its discretion in 4 particulars.

In the absence of a statement of facts it must be presumed on appeal that the evidence supports the verdict and the judgment of the trial court. Levitz Furniture Co. v. State, (Waco, Tex.Civ.App.) NRE, 471 S.W.2d 452; Englander v. Kennedy, Tex., 428 S.W.2d 806; Giddings v. Simpson, (Waco, Tex.Civ.App.) NWH, 532 S.W.2d 719.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Strickland v. Strickland, 647 S.W.2d 70, 1983 Tex. App. LEXIS 3841 (Tex. Ct. App. 1983).

647 S.W.2d 70 (Strickland v. Strickland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Forest Lane Porsche-Audi Associates v. Defries
730 S.W.2d 80 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)