Strickland v. Strickland

647 S.W.2d 70, 1983 Tex. App. LEXIS 3841
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 20, 1983
DocketNo. 10-82-114-CV
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 647 S.W.2d 70 (Strickland v. Strickland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Strickland v. Strickland, 647 S.W.2d 70, 1983 Tex. App. LEXIS 3841 (Tex. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

OPINION

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by David Strickland from a divorce decree rendered July 1, [71]*711982. No statement of facts was timely filed and Appellant filed his motion for an extension of time under Rule 21c TRCP, 16 days late. This Court has no authority to consider a late motion for extension of time to file a statement of facts. B.D. Click Co., Inc. v. Safari Drilling Corp., Tex., 638 S.W.2d 860.

Appellant appeals asserting the trial court abused its discretion in 4 particulars.

In the absence of a statement of facts it must be presumed on appeal that the evidence supports the verdict and the judgment of the trial court. Levitz Furniture Co. v. State, (Waco, Tex.Civ.App.) NRE, 471 S.W.2d 452; Englander v. Kennedy, Tex., 428 S.W.2d 806; Giddings v. Simpson, (Waco, Tex.Civ.App.) NWH, 532 S.W.2d 719.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Forest Lane Porsche-Audi Associates v. Defries
730 S.W.2d 80 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
647 S.W.2d 70, 1983 Tex. App. LEXIS 3841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strickland-v-strickland-texapp-1983.