Strickland v. Strickland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Strickland v. Strickland

160 A.D. 900, 144 N.Y.S. 1146

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1913

StatusPublished

This text of 160 A.D. 900 (Strickland v. Strickland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Strickland v. Strickland, 160 A.D. 900, 144 N.Y.S. 1146 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to punish for contempt granted, and proceedings remitted to the Special Term to determine the nature and extent of the punishment therefor. But this decision is without prejudice to an application to such Special Term by defendant to be permitted to pay the arrears of alimony in installments, and, pending such payment, to be relieved from imprisonment, or to an application upon proper papers and due notice to have the amount of such alimony reduced. Burr, Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to punish for contempt granted, and proceedings remitted to the Special Term to determine the nature and extent of the punishment therefor. But this decision is without prejudice to an application to such Special Term by defendant to be permitted to pay the arrears of alimony in installments, and, pending such payment, to be relieved from imprisonment, or to an application upon proper papers and due notice to have the amount of such alimony reduced. Burr, Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 A.D. 900, 144 N.Y.S. 1146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strickland-v-strickland-nyappdiv-1913.