Strickland v. Strickland

100 S.E. 230, 24 Ga. App. 200, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 499
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 20, 1919·No. 10157·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Peb Curiam.

Where a constable is specially deputized by the sheriff and sworn in for the purpose of serving a particular writ, he becomes a de facto deputy sheriff, and service by him is legal. Twiggs v. Hardwick, 61 Ga. 273; Hinton v. Lindsay, 20 Ga. 746; Blount v. Wells, 55 Ga. 282. See also Hartshorn v. Bank, 15 Ga. App. 173 (82 S. E. 805), where it is held that when a constable, although irregularly appointed or qualified as a deputy sheriff, assumes to act as a lawful deputy sheriff, his acts are those of a de facto officer, and therefore legal.

The court did not err in refusing to dismiss the levy:

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., Bloodioorth and Stephens, Jj., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Strickland v. Strickland, 100 S.E. 230, 24 Ga. App. 200, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 499 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

100 S.E. 230 (Strickland v. Strickland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bailey v. Kennett
122 S.E. 804 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)