Strickland v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Strickland v. State

112 S.E. 740, 28 Ga. App. 638, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 743

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Strickland v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 27 Ga. App. 772 →

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 13, 1922·No. 13486·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The venue of the offense was sufficiently shown.

2. Under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court, the failure of the judge in a criminal ease to charge on the good character of the accused is not error, in the absence of a timely and appropriate written request.

3. Neither of the remaining grounds of the amendment to the motion fox a new trial shows reversible error.

4. The verdict is supported by some evidence, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court. cannot interefere. -Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

1. The venue of the offense was sufficiently shown.

2. Under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court, the failure of the judge in a criminal ease to charge on the good character of the accused is not error, in the absence of a timely and appropriate written request.

3. Neither of the remaining grounds of the amendment to the motion fox a new trial shows reversible error.

4. The verdict is supported by some evidence, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court. cannot interefere. -Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Strickland v. State, 112 S.E. 740, 28 Ga. App. 638, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 743 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

112 S.E. 740 (Strickland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.