Strickland v. State

135 So. 3d 348, 2013 WL 6097539, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18511
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Strickland v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 3571
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 20, 2013·No. No. 1D11-6674·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This Anders1 appeal arises from a judgment and sentence for possession of a [349]*349firearm by a convicted felon pursuant to section 790.28, Florida Statutes (2008). We affirm the judgment and sentence, but remand with instructions to correct two scrivener’s errors on’ the trial court’s cost and fines worksheet. The first appears in a fee listed and assessed on the worksheet that cites a non-existent statute, section 938.93, Florida Statutes, which should be changed to “section 938.03, Florida Statutes.” The second appears in the last fee listed and assessed on the worksheet that cites a non-existent statute, section 938.185, Florida Statutes, which should be changed to “section 939.185, Florida Statutes.”

WOLF, ROBERTS, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Strickland v. State, 135 So. 3d 348, 2013 WL 6097539, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18511 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

135 So. 3d 348 (Strickland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)