Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Strickland v. State

Strickland v. State

858 So. 2d 1118, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16178, 2003 WL 22442991
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Strickland v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 889 So. 2d 219 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 29, 2003·No. No. 4D02-2054·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to appellant seeking to vacate his plea in postconviction proceedings. As appellant pled to the offense and did not move to withdraw his plea, he cannot raise those issues on direct appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2) (A) (ii).

GUNTHER, WARNER and MAY, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Strickland v. State, 858 So. 2d 1118, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16178, 2003 WL 22442991 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

858 So. 2d 1118 (Strickland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.