Strickland v. State

858 So. 2d 1118, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16178, 2003 WL 22442991
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 29, 2003
DocketNo. 4D02-2054
StatusPublished

This text of 858 So. 2d 1118 (Strickland v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Strickland v. State, 858 So. 2d 1118, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16178, 2003 WL 22442991 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to appellant seeking to vacate his plea in postconviction proceedings. As appellant pled to the offense and did not move to withdraw his plea, he cannot raise those issues on direct appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2) (A) (ii).

GUNTHER, WARNER and MAY, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
858 So. 2d 1118, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16178, 2003 WL 22442991, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strickland-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.