Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Strickland v. State

Strickland v. State

701 So. 2d 909, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13345, 1997 WL 734914
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Strickland v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 681 So. 2d 929 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 1, 1997·No. No. 96-4442·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The prosecution traversed allegations made in the motion to dismiss filed below in Case No. 93-2461C, before that case was consolidated with Case No. 94-110C. The addendum to the motion to dismiss was also met with a sworn traverse. Under Florida Criminal Procedure Rule 3.190(c)(4)(d), therefore, the motion to dismiss (with addendum) should have been denied. On this basis, we affirm, without reaching the question of statutory construction addressed below.

ERVIN, KAHN and BENTON, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Strickland v. State, 701 So. 2d 909, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13345, 1997 WL 734914 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

701 So. 2d 909 (Strickland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.