Strickland v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Strickland v. State

128 So. 118, 23 Ala. App. 510, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 123

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 22, 1930

Docket4 Div. 586.

StatusPublished

This text of 128 So. 118 (Strickland v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Strickland v. State, 128 So. 118, 23 Ala. App. 510, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 123 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

BRIOKEN, P. J.

The exceptions reserved by defendant to the rulings of the court upon the admission of evidence are so wholly without merit they need not be discussed.

This appellant was convicted for the offense of violating the prohibition law,- and upon the trial there was evidence tending to show his guilt. It follows that the affirmative charge requested by him was not in point and was properly refused.

. No other questions are involved.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRIOKEN, P. J.

The exceptions reserved by defendant to the rulings of the court upon the admission of evidence are so wholly without merit they need not be discussed.

This appellant was convicted for the offense of violating the prohibition law,- and upon the trial there was evidence tending to show his guilt. It follows that the affirmative charge requested by him was not in point and was properly refused.

. No other questions are involved.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 So. 118, 23 Ala. App. 510, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strickland-v-state-alactapp-1930.