Strickland v. State
128 So. 118, 23 Ala. App. 510, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 123
Opinion
The exceptions reserved by defendant to the rulings of the court upon the admission of evidence are so wholly without merit they need not be discussed.
This appellant was convicted for the offense of violating the prohibition law,- and upon the trial there was evidence tending to show his guilt. It follows that the affirmative charge requested by him was not in point and was properly refused.
. No other questions are involved.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Strickland v. State, 128 So. 118, 23 Ala. App. 510, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 123 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).
128 So. 118 (Strickland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.