Strickland v. Southern Ry. Co.
This text of 93 S.E. 187 (Strickland v. Southern Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
This is an action for death by the wrongful act. The deceased was an engineer running from Savannah, Ga., to Jacksonville, Fla. When the train reached the station in Jacksonville, the engineer, in making an inspection of his engine, found that the drain cock to the air reservoir was stopped up, and took a piece of wire to open it. When the wire was put into the opening of the drain cock, it removed the obstruction, and the contents of liquid and solid matter struck his hand and caused injuries from which it is alleged that the engineer subsequently died. The defendant made a motion for a nonsuit, which was refused, and subsequently *523 made a motion for a directed verdict, which was granted. From the judgment entered thereon this appeal was taken. The verdict was directed on the ground that there was no evidence of negligence on the part of the defendant, that the injury was caused solely by the negligence of the plaintiff, and that the plaintiff had assumed the risk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
93 S.E. 187, 107 S.C. 521, 1917 S.C. LEXIS 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strickland-v-southern-ry-co-sc-1917.