Strickland v. . Smith
This text of 39 S.E.2d 381 (Strickland v. . Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case and the case of Kennedy v. Smith, ante, 514, grew out of the same facts, and the two cases were tried together. The facts are set out in the Kennedy case. However, it appeared in this case that plaintiff Strickland was a passenger in the automobile driven by Kennedy at the time of the collision with defendant’s truck. There was no evidence upon which contributory negligence could be imputed to this plaintiff, and the court properly so instructed the jury.
An examination of the other assignments of error brought forward in defendant’s appeal fails to disclose prejudicial error. In the trial we find
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
39 S.E.2d 381, 226 N.C. 517, 1946 N.C. LEXIS 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strickland-v-smith-nc-1946.