Strickland v. Reese

34 S.E. 275, 110 Ga. 263, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 517
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 1, 1899·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Fish, J.

Sustaining for the first time a certiorari in a case, upon the ground that the verdict in the lower court was contrary to the evidence, is equivalent to the first grant of a new trial. As it is very clear that the verdict rendered in the justice’s court in favor of the plaintiff in error was not demanded by the evidence, this case falls within the rule so often announced by this court, and now-embodied in section 5585 of the Civil Code, that the first grant of a new trial will not be disturbed when it does not appear that the judge abused his discretion in granting the same.

judgment affirmed.

All the. Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Strickland v. Reese, 34 S.E. 275, 110 Ga. 263, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 517 (Ga. 1899).

34 S.E. 275 (Strickland v. Reese) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johns v. McBride
112 S.E. 831 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Gresham v. Lee
112 S.E. 524 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
King Bros. v. Turner
65 S.E. 321 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)
Shirley v. Swafford
45 S.E. 722 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)
Flanders v. Wood
38 S.E. 975 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)