Strickland v. Peerless Casualty Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Strickland v. Peerless Casualty Co.

93 A. 356, 113 Me. 566, 1915 Me. LEXIS 127

DecidedMarch 22, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 93 A. 356 (Strickland v. Peerless Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Strickland v. Peerless Casualty Co., 93 A. 356, 113 Me. 566, 1915 Me. LEXIS 127 (Me. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an action of assumpsit to recover sick benefits under a policy of insurance. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff for the sum of one hundred and fifty-five dollars and twenty-five cents, the full amount claimed for sickness between April 20, 1912 and July 27, 1912. The defendant brings the case before us upon bill of exceptions and the usual motion for new trial.

The defendant does not press its exceptions, but relies wholly upon its motion. Exceptions and motion overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an action of assumpsit to recover sick benefits under a policy of insurance. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff for the sum of one hundred and fifty-five dollars and twenty-five cents, the full amount claimed for sickness between April 20, 1912 and July 27, 1912. The defendant brings the case before us upon bill of exceptions and the usual motion for new trial.

The defendant does not press its exceptions, but relies wholly upon its motion. Exceptions and motion overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 A. 356, 113 Me. 566, 1915 Me. LEXIS 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strickland-v-peerless-casualty-co-me-1915.