Strickland v. Mondule
This text of 597 F. App'x 161 (Strickland v. Mondule) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Harold E. Strickland appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and entering judgment for Defendants in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Strickland v. Mondule, No. 7:12-cv-00559-JPJ-PMS (W.D.Va. Sept. 8, 2014). We deny the motions for appointment of counsel, for preparation of a transcript at government expense, and to appear at oral argument, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
597 F. App'x 161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strickland-v-mondule-ca4-2015.