Strickland v. Maass
827 P.2d 208, 112 Or. App. 319, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 686
This text of 827 P.2d 208 (Strickland v. Maass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Strickland v. Maass, 827 P.2d 208, 112 Or. App. 319, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 686 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).
Opinion
Plaintiff seeks habeas corpus relief, contending that his attorney in a post-conviction relief proceeding was ineffective, because he failed to raise ineffective assistance of trial counsel as an issue. The habeas court correctly dismissed the writ for lack of jurisdiction, McClure v. Maass, 110 Or App 119, 821 P2d 1105 (1991), rev den 313 Or 74 (1992), and we affirm.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McClure v. Maass
821 P.2d 1105 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1991)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
827 P.2d 208, 112 Or. App. 319, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strickland-v-maass-orctapp-1992.