Strickland v. Maass

827 P.2d 208, 112 Or. App. 319, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 686
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided April 8, 1992·No. 88C-11641; CA A66064·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff seeks habeas corpus relief, contending that his attorney in a post-conviction relief proceeding was ineffective, because he failed to raise ineffective assistance of trial counsel as an issue. The habeas court correctly dismissed the writ for lack of jurisdiction, McClure v. Maass, 110 Or App 119, 821 P2d 1105 (1991), rev den 313 Or 74 (1992), and we affirm.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Strickland v. Maass, 827 P.2d 208, 112 Or. App. 319, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 686 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

827 P.2d 208 (Strickland v. Maass) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McClure v. Maass
821 P.2d 1105 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1991)