Strickland v. Jelks

93 S.E. 260, 20 Ga. App. 604, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 993
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 25, 1917
Docket8357
StatusPublished

This text of 93 S.E. 260 (Strickland v. Jelks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Strickland v. Jelks, 93 S.E. 260, 20 Ga. App. 604, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 993 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Luke, J.

This case has been before this court heretofore, and is reported in 18 Ga. App. 86 (88 S. E. 906). It was then held that the petition set out a good cause of action. Thé jury were authorized to find, from the evidence, that the plaintiff had proved the case as laid; and, there being no error of law, and the verdict having the approval of the trial judge, the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial is not erroneous.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and George, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 S.E. 260, 20 Ga. App. 604, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 993, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strickland-v-jelks-gactapp-1917.