Strickland v. Hamilton

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Strickland v. Hamilton

98 S.E. 740, 23 Ga. App. 532, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 185

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 4, 1919

Docket9726

StatusPublished

This text of 98 S.E. 740 (Strickland v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Strickland v. Hamilton, 98 S.E. 740, 23 Ga. App. 532, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 185 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

1. “The writ of certiorari will not lie to correct errors committed by a justice of the peace in proceedings under the Penal Code [1910], §§ 1331 et seq., against the putative father of a bastard child, where judgment is rendered requiring the defendant to give security for the support of the child, and binding him over to the superior court upon his failure to give such security. Such is the ruling in the ease of Hyden v. State, 40 Ga. 476; and upon the formal review of that decision” the Supreme Court “declines to overrule it.” Strickland v. Hamilton, 148 Ga. 820 (98 S. E. 471).

2. The foregoing ruling was made by the Supreme Court upon a question certified by this court in this case; and it follows therefrom that the judge of the superior court did not err in refusing to sanction the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth and Stephens, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, P. J.

1. “The writ of certiorari will not lie to correct errors committed by a justice of the peace in proceedings under the Penal Code [1910], §§ 1331 et seq., against the putative father of a bastard child, where judgment is rendered requiring the defendant to give security for the support of the child, and binding him over to the superior court upon his failure to give such security. Such is the ruling in the ease of Hyden v. State, 40 Ga. 476; and upon the formal review of that decision” the Supreme Court “declines to overrule it.” Strickland v. Hamilton, 148 Ga. 820 (98 S. E. 471).

2. The foregoing ruling was made by the Supreme Court upon a question certified by this court in this case; and it follows therefrom that the judge of the superior court did not err in refusing to sanction the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth and Stephens, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

98 S.E. 740, 23 Ga. App. 532, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strickland-v-hamilton-gactapp-1919.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack