Strickland v. Fender
This text of 82 S.E. 561 (Strickland v. Fender) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. There was no error in overruling the motion for a continuance.
2. Under the ruling in Greenfield v. McIntyre, 112 Ga. 691 (38 S. E. 44), before heirs at law of a deceased intestate can recover land which belonged to the estate of such intestate, they must prove that there was no administration on the estate, or that the administrator, if there was one, assented to their bringing the suit. See also Crummey v. Bentley, 114 Ga. 746 (3), 749 (40 S. E. 765); Wilson v. Wood, 127 Ga. 316 (56 S. E. 457). No ease of fraud by an administrator, or other circumstance varying the general rule, as in Anderson v. Goodwin, 125 Ga. 663 (5), 668 (54 S. E. 679), appears in this case.
3. The rulings'above cited are controlling in the present case, and under them it was error to overrule the motion for a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
82 S.E. 561, 142 Ga. 132, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strickland-v-fender-ga-1914.