Strickland v. Delo
This text of 44 F.3d 710 (Strickland v. Delo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Kevin Bernard Strickland, a Missouri inmate, filed a pro se complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against numerous officials at Potosí Correctional Center and four John Does. Strickland asserted constitutional claims based on disciplinary and other action taken against him beginning in November 1989. The district court1 granted summary judgment in favor of defendants, 758 F.Supp. 1319, and Strickland appeals.
After careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of defendants. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir.R. 47B. Strickland’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 F.3d 710, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 538, 1995 WL 10818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strickland-v-delo-ca8-1995.