Strickland v. Coe

185 So. 616, 135 Fla. 693, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1623
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 31, 1938
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 185 So. 616 (Strickland v. Coe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Strickland v. Coe, 185 So. 616, 135 Fla. 693, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1623 (Fla. 1938).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Writ of error is to a judgment in favor of plaintiff.

The plaintiff in error has stated eight questions for our consideration, but after all is said, there is only one question presented by the record and that is, whether or not the evidence was legally sufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment.

After a careful consideration of the entire record, we must hold the evidence to be legally sufficient and, no reversible error appearing, the judgment must be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stalvey v. State
193 So. 547 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 So. 616, 135 Fla. 693, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strickland-v-coe-fla-1938.