Strickland v. Atlanta & West Point Railroad

24 S.E. 981, 99 Ga. 124
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 23, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 24 S.E. 981 (Strickland v. Atlanta & West Point Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Strickland v. Atlanta & West Point Railroad, 24 S.E. 981, 99 Ga. 124 (Ga. 1896).

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

1. The action being for damages resulting from an alleged assault 'and battery, a plea admitting the beating and averring that it was lawful because necessarily inflicted by the defendant’s servant for the purpose of protecting his master’s property from an unlawful trespass on the part of the plaintiff, was a plea of justification, and consequently defendant’s counsel were entitled to open and conclude the argument.

2. The evidence was conflicting, but that which was introduced for the defendant fully warranted a finding that the beating was justifiable. Judgment affirmed.

J. F. Golightly, for plaintiff. Dorsey, Brewster & Howell, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wyatt v. Baker
165 S.E. 133 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Darby v. Moore
87 S.E. 1067 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 S.E. 981, 99 Ga. 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strickland-v-atlanta-west-point-railroad-ga-1896.