Strickland v. AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY

256 S.E.2d 92, 149 Ga. App. 690, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 1988
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 24, 1979
Docket57218
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 256 S.E.2d 92 (Strickland v. AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Strickland v. AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY, 256 S.E.2d 92, 149 Ga. App. 690, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 1988 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

Banke, Presiding Judge.

The employer-appellee in this worker’s compensation case prevailed below on the basis of a finding that the employee’s claim was barred by the *691 1-year statute of limitation set forth in Code Ann. § 114-305. On appeal to this court, the claimant has attached to her brief copies of certain documents allegedly filed with the Board of Workers’ Compensation but omitted from the record transmitted to the superior court and, consequently, from the record transmitted to this court. These documents indicate that the original claim for compensation may have been filed earlier than the board’s order indicates. The claimant contends that this earlier filing date was within the statute of limitation. The appellee disputes this contention. Held:

Argued February 5, 1979 — Decided April 24, 1979. Freeman & Hawkins, William Q. Bird, for appellant. Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hiers, James B. Hiers, Jr., for appellees.

Exhibits contained in an appellate brief which do not appear in the record or transcript cannot be considered by this court and afford no basis for reversal. Jenkins v. Chambers, 127 Ga. App. 200, 204 (193 SE2d 222) (1972); Life Ins. Co. v. Thomas, 127 Ga. App. 682 (1) (194 SE2d 625) (1972). No claim was made in the superior court that the record was deficient, and no request was made that it be corrected. Consequently, we cannot say that the superior court erred in making its ruling based on the record before it. That record fully supports the board’s ruling that the claim was barred by the statute of limitation.

Judgment affirmed.

Underwood and Carley, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stebbins v. Georgia Power Co.
555 S.E.2d 906 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2001)
Abdalla v. DDCB, INC.
455 S.E.2d 598 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1995)
Gerdes v. Dziewinski
377 S.E.2d 550 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)
Spikes v. Citizens State Bank
347 S.E.2d 310 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)
Whatley's Interiors, Inc. v. Anderson
336 S.E.2d 326 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)
Taylor v. Bentley
305 S.E.2d 617 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
Suggs v. State
296 S.E.2d 124 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
256 S.E.2d 92, 149 Ga. App. 690, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 1988, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strickland-v-american-motorists-insurance-company-gactapp-1979.