Stricker v. Holtz

50 Iowa 291
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedDecember 13, 1878
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 50 Iowa 291 (Stricker v. Holtz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stricker v. Holtz, 50 Iowa 291 (iowa 1878).

Opinion

Adams, J.

i Arrr'ALdismissal. If the decision does not affect the plaintiff’s right to recover in another action it is not final, and the error °f ^le Justice is reviewable upon writ of error ancl not upon appeal. Belding v. Torrence, 39 Iowa, 516. In that case there was a dismissal for want of jurisdiction, but the same principle is involved as in the case at bar. The appellant insists that there was at least a final judgment for costs. But costs are a mere incident to the decision. The judgment, the finality of which gives a right of appeal, must be a determination of some question affecting the merits of the controversy, or some portion of it. In Griffin v. Moss, 3 Iowa, 262, it was held that an .appeal would lie from an order of a justice dismissing an action, but in that case judgment was rendered against the plaintiff for fifty dollars and fifty-five cents damages, as well as costs.

In dismissing the plaintiff’s appeal in the case at bar we think the Circuit Court did1 not err.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anthes v. Booser
84 N.W. 516 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1900)
Lorber v. Connor
47 N.W. 1006 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 Iowa 291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stricker-v-holtz-iowa-1878.