Stribling v. United States
This text of 68 Ct. Cl. 213 (Stribling v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court:
This is a claim of an Army officer who was assigned on July 30,1920, to duty “ involving regular and frequent aerial flights,” and from December, 1921, to January, 1922, the period for which increased pay is claimed in this suit, performed duty involving regular and frequent aerial flights.
The act of June 4, 1920, 41 Stat. 769, provides that “ Offi- ■ cers and enlisted men of the Army shall receive an increase of 50 per centum of their pay while on duty requiring them to participate regularly and frequently in aerial flights.”
It is clear that this case is ruled by the decision of this court particularly in Levy Johnson v. United States, H-54, decided March 18, 1929 [67 C. Cls. 318], and also the cases of Culver v. United States, 60 C. Cls. 825, 271 U. S. 315, and Bradshaw v. United States, 62 C. Cls. 638. See also in the same connection Luskey v. United States, 56 C. Cls. 411, 262 U. S. 62; and Clark v. United States, 60 C. Cls. 589.
The plaintiff is entitled to recover $700, the amount claimed in the petition, and it is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
68 Ct. Cl. 213, 1929 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 297, 1929 WL 2458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stribling-v-united-states-cc-1929.