Stribling v. State

109 S.E. 517, 27 Ga. App. 596, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 295
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 16, 1921
Docket12665
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 109 S.E. 517 (Stribling v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stribling v. State, 109 S.E. 517, 27 Ga. App. 596, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 295 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

Luke, J.

Stribling was convicted of the offense of unlawfully distilling and manufacturing alcoholic liquors. The evidence did not sustain the conviction. At best, the evidence showed only that the defendant was getting ready to manufacture liquor. The allegation of the indictment not being sustained by the evidence, it was error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stenson v. State
164 S.E.2d 280 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 S.E. 517, 27 Ga. App. 596, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stribling-v-state-gactapp-1921.