Stribling v. State

109 S.E. 517, 27 Ga. App. 596, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 295
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 16, 1921·No. 12665·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

Stribling was convicted of the offense of unlawfully distilling and manufacturing alcoholic liquors. The evidence did not sustain the conviction. At best, the evidence showed only that the defendant was getting ready to manufacture liquor. The allegation of the indictment not being sustained by the evidence, it was error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stribling v. State, 109 S.E. 517, 27 Ga. App. 596, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 295 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

109 S.E. 517 (Stribling v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stenson v. State
164 S.E.2d 280 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1968)