Stribling Bros. MacHinery Company, Inc. v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Stribling Bros. MacHinery Company, Inc. v. United States

353 F.2d 208, 16 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5998, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 3818

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedNovember 30, 1965

Docket21933_1

StatusPublished

This text of 353 F.2d 208 (Stribling Bros. MacHinery Company, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stribling Bros. MacHinery Company, Inc. v. United States, 353 F.2d 208, 16 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5998, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 3818 (5th Cir. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

353 F.2d 208

65-2 USTC P 9760

STRIBLING BROS. MACHINERY COMPANY, Inc., Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 21933.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 30, 1965.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi; William Harold Cox, Judge.

Robert C. Cannada, Jackson, Miss., Paul M. Newton, Robert S. Newton, Gulfport, Miss., for appellant. Newton & Newton, Gulfport, Miss., Butler, Snow, O'Mara, Stevens & Cannada, Jackson, Miss., of counsel.

John B. Jones, Jr., Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Robert E. Hauberg, U.S. Atty., Jackson, Miss., Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Joseph Kovner, Edward L. Rogers, Herbert Grossman, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Before JONES and THORNBERRY, Circuit Judges, and SLOAN, District judge.

PER CURIAM:

The narrow issue on this appeal has been adequately stated and properly decided by the district court. Stribling Brothers Machinery Company, Inc. v. United States of America, 234 F.Supp. 993. The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI