Striano v. Deepdale General Hospital

54 A.D.2d 730, 387 N.Y.S.2d 678, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14345
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 18, 1976
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 54 A.D.2d 730 (Striano v. Deepdale General Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Striano v. Deepdale General Hospital, 54 A.D.2d 730, 387 N.Y.S.2d 678, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14345 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendant Buchbinder appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 19, 1976, which denied his motion for summary judgment. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. The 11-year-old plaintiff was hospitalized for a tonsillectomy. His doctor, appellant, prescribed a postoperative diet of milk, water, ice cream and jello; cooked cereal, broth and junket were added the following day. The nurse knew that hot tea was not allowed. The day after the operation, however, for her own convenience, she ordered a complete liquid diet, which included hot water for tea. She intended to remove the hot water from the tray, but before she did so, the child started to eat. While picking up the jello dish, he knocked over the hot water, burning his ankle. From these facts it is clear that the doctor was not guilty of malpractice. Moreover, he is not responsible for the nurse’s negligence; she acted contrary to his instructions and was under the control of the hospital. Unlike the case of Weinstein v Prostkoff (23 Mise 2d 376, revd on other grounds 13 AD2d 539), where the doctor was held liable for failure to supervise the nurse-anesthetist, the present instance of serving a meal does not involve a medical procedure calling for close supervision and instruction. As a matter of law, the doctor is not liable. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Cohalan and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Doe v. Smith
184 Misc. 2d 186 (New York Supreme Court, 2000)
LoPiano v. Mindich
237 A.D.2d 415 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Banks v. Barkoukis
231 A.D.2d 598 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 A.D.2d 730, 387 N.Y.S.2d 678, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/striano-v-deepdale-general-hospital-nyappdiv-1976.