Streu v. State
161 S.W.3d 382, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 385, 2005 WL 589800
Opinion
ORDER
Movant was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison. He now seeks post-conviction relief, claiming that his trial counsel was ineffective for not making proper objections to portions of the State’s closing argument, which allegedly bolstered or vouched for the veracity of its key witness. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Streu v. State, 161 S.W.3d 382, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 385, 2005 WL 589800 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).
161 S.W.3d 382 (Streu v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Streu v. Dormire
557 F.3d 960 (Eighth Circuit, 2009)
Larry Streu v. Dave Dormire
Eighth Circuit, 2009
Streu v. State
209 S.W.3d 556 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)