Stressman v. Lefler

597 So. 2d 308, 1992 WL 35387
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 26, 1992
Docket92-00005
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 597 So. 2d 308 (Stressman v. Lefler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stressman v. Lefler, 597 So. 2d 308, 1992 WL 35387 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

597 So.2d 308 (1992)

Gwen STRESSMAN and Wayne C. Duncan, her husband, Petitioners,
v.
Antoinette LEFLER and Anthony Lefler, Respondents.

No. 92-00005.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 26, 1992.

*309 Robert Fraser, Brandon, for petitioners.

John R. Mathias of Stuart & Strickland, P.A., Tampa, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs petition for a writ of certiorari, arguing that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of the law in denying their request for a registered nurse to attend the wife's independent medical examination in this personal injury lawsuit. Although the trial judge denied this request, he stated at the hearing that he would allow a court reporter to be present at the examination. See Collins v. Skinner, 576 So.2d 1377 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Stakley v. Allstate Ins. Co., 547 So.2d 275 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). We deny the petition.

Plaintiffs' counsel correctly argues that, as a general rule, he would be entitled to attend this examination. Stakley. At trial, if he wished to contest the doctor's description on the examination, he would not be ethically authorized to testify. Fla.Bar Code Prof.Resp. D.R. 4-3.7. The registered nurse is employed by the plaintiffs' counsel as a legal assistant. It is clear that plaintiffs' counsel wishes to use his nurse-employee to provide expert testimony that he himself could not provide. From this record, we cannot conclude that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of the law in denying the plaintiffs' request for this specific person to attend the examination. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of certiorari.

LEHAN, A.C.J., and PARKER and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Maraman v. State
980 So. 2d 1096 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Stephens v. State
932 So. 2d 563 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Wilkins v. Palumbo
617 So. 2d 850 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
597 So. 2d 308, 1992 WL 35387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stressman-v-lefler-fladistctapp-1992.