Streiter v. Weissman

208 Misc. 57, 144 N.Y.S.2d 446, 1955 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3764
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 27, 1955·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In view of the fact that the rent commission granted tenant’s application for a reduction in rent because the tenant had been deprived of the storage space here involved, the latter may not retain the use of such space. Tenant’s resumption of occupancy was without landlords’ permission and constituted an intrusion or squatting upon the premises in question within the purview of subdivision 4 of section 1411 of the Civil Practice Act.

The final order should be unanimously reversed, on the law and facts, with $30 costs to landlords, and final order directed in favor of landlords, with appropriate costs in the court below.

Eleihfeld, Di Gtovanha and Keogh, JJ., concur.

Pinal order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Streiter v. Weissman, 208 Misc. 57, 144 N.Y.S.2d 446, 1955 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3764 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

208 Misc. 57 (Streiter v. Weissman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

MASTAS v. Extra Closet, Inc.
146 Misc. 2d 698 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1990)