Streiffer v. Isidore D. Wolfson & Rita Woodmere Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Streiffer v. Isidore D. Wolfson & Rita Woodmere Corp.

235 A.D. 707

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 235 A.D. 707 (Streiffer v. Isidore D. Wolfson & Rita Woodmere Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Streiffer v. Isidore D. Wolfson & Rita Woodmere Corp., 235 A.D. 707 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Order granting motion of defendant Fay Wolfson to dismiss the complaint as to her modified so as to provide that she be retained in the action as a party defendant, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Although no relief may be had against her, nor in favor of her creditors, she is nevertheless a proper party defendant for the purpose of enabling the court to adjudicate completely the rights of all the parties concerned. Orders denying motions to dismiss the complaint as against defendants Rita Woodmere Corporation and Isidore D. Wolfson affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, payable by said defendants jointly; said defendants to answer within ten days from service on each of them of a copy of the order herein. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting motion of defendant Fay Wolfson to dismiss the complaint as to her modified so as to provide that she be retained in the action as a party defendant, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Although no relief may be had against her, nor in favor of her creditors, she is nevertheless a proper party defendant for the purpose of enabling the court to adjudicate completely the rights of all the parties concerned. Orders denying motions to dismiss the complaint as against defendants Rita Woodmere Corporation and Isidore D. Wolfson affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, payable by said defendants jointly; said defendants to answer within ten days from service on each of them of a copy of the order herein. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

235 A.D. 707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/streiffer-v-isidore-d-wolfson-rita-woodmere-corp-nyappdiv-1932.