Strehlow v. Legend Equities Corp.
Opinion
We reverse a temporary injunction that enforces the non-solicitation clauses of the appellants’ sales representative contracts. When the appellants signed the contracts in [1077]*10771989, they worked for a different company. The contracts were assigned to the appellee when it purchased the business. The. appellants never consented to the assignment.
Under Florida law, a contract for personal services is not assignable absent consent, and a covenant that restricts competition after termination of such a contract is unenforceable by the assignee unless the party who is burdened by the restriction agrees. See Johnston v. Dockside Fueling of No. America, Inc., 658 So.2d 618 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Schweiger v. Hoch, 223 So.2d 557 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969). We decline to revisit Schiveiger as the appellee asks. We find the reasoning and the result in that case to be sound.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
727 So. 2d 1076 (Strehlow v. Legend Equities Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.