Strege v. Launching All Hawaiian Nuclear Missiles

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Strege v. Launching All Hawaiian Nuclear Missiles

CourtHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 12, 2025

DocketCAAP-25-0000448

StatusPublished

This text of Strege v. Launching All Hawaiian Nuclear Missiles (Strege v. Launching All Hawaiian Nuclear Missiles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Strege v. Launching All Hawaiian Nuclear Missiles, (hawapp 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 12-NOV-2025 08:28 AM Dkt. 21 ORD

NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

ADAM STREGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LAUNCHING ALL HAWAII NUCLEAR MISSILES; MAUI CARPENTERS UNION; GROUP BUILDERS; MAUI MCDONALDS HAMBURGER RESTAURANTS; HOMEOWNER 446 HAUOLA PLACE LAHAINA; MAUI TACOS; and NORDIC PCL CONSTRUCTION, Defendants-Appellees.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT (CIVIL NO. 2CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL (By: Hiraoka, Presiding Judge, Wadsworth and McCullen, JJ.)

Upon review of the record, it appears that: (1) Self-represented Plaintiff-Appellant Adam Strege filed the notice of appeal on June 12, 2025. (2) The court's October 28, 2025 order denied Strege's motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and stated that within 10 days, Strege "shall pay the filing fees in the full amount to the Supreme Court Clerk's Office[,]" and "[f]ailure to pay the filing fees may result in the appeal being dismissed." (3) Strege has not complied with the October 28, 2025 order, the time for compliance has expired, and Strege has not NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

paid the appellate filing fees. As a result, the record on appeal has not been prepared. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed. See Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 24(c) ("Failure of the unsuccessful movant to pay the unpaid filing fees or to give security for costs shall not affect the validity of the appeal, but is ground for such action as the appellate court having jurisdiction over the appeal deems appropriate, and may include dismissal of the appeal."). DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 12, 2025.

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Presiding Judge

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge

/s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen Associate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 12-NOV-2025 08:28 AM Dkt. 21 ORD

NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

ADAM STREGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LAUNCHING ALL HAWAII NUCLEAR MISSILES; MAUI CARPENTERS UNION; GROUP BUILDERS; MAUI MCDONALDS HAMBURGER RESTAURANTS; HOMEOWNER 446 HAUOLA PLACE LAHAINA; MAUI TACOS; and NORDIC PCL CONSTRUCTION, Defendants-Appellees.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT (CIVIL NO. 2CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL (By: Hiraoka, Presiding Judge, Wadsworth and McCullen, JJ.)

Upon review of the record, it appears that: (1) Self-represented Plaintiff-Appellant Adam Strege filed the notice of appeal on June 12, 2025. (2) The court's October 28, 2025 order denied Strege's motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and stated that within 10 days, Strege "shall pay the filing fees in the full amount to the Supreme Court Clerk's Office[,]" and "[f]ailure to pay the filing fees may result in the appeal being dismissed." (3) Strege has not complied with the October 28, 2025 order, the time for compliance has expired, and Strege has not NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

paid the appellate filing fees. As a result, the record on appeal has not been prepared. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed. See Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 24(c) ("Failure of the unsuccessful movant to pay the unpaid filing fees or to give security for costs shall not affect the validity of the appeal, but is ground for such action as the appellate court having jurisdiction over the appeal deems appropriate, and may include dismissal of the appeal."). DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 12, 2025.

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Presiding Judge

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge

/s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen Associate Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Strege v. Launching All Hawaiian Nuclear Missiles, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strege-v-launching-all-hawaiian-nuclear-missiles-hawapp-2025.