Streety v. State

96 So. 160, 85 Fla. 387
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 10, 1923·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This writ of error was taken to a judgment of conviction of an assault with intent to commit murder in the second degree.

There were no material or harmful errors in admitting evidence, and the conflicts in the testimony have been settled by the finding of the jury which has ample support of the evidence.

No other questions are presented.

Affirmed.

Taylor, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Browne and West, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Streety v. State, 96 So. 160, 85 Fla. 387 (Fla. 1923).

96 So. 160 (Streety v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Taylor v. State
98 So. 77 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1923)