Streets v. Mangena
Opinion
USDC SDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED THEODOSIA BILLIE STREETS, DOC #: DATE FILED: _ 11/8/2024 Plaintiff, -against- 23 Civ. 10648 (AT) (SDA) DANIEL MANGENA a.k.a. LINDANI ORDER ADOPTING MANGENA, and DREAMER HQ, INC., REPORT & RECOMMENDATION Defendants. ANALISA TORRES, District Judge: Having received no objection to the Honorable Stewart D. Aaron’s October 18, 2024 report and recommendation (“R&R”), the Court has reviewed the R&R and finds “no clear error on the face of the record.” Urena v. New York, 160 F. Supp. 2d 606, 609-10 (S.D.N.Y. 2001) (quoting Nelson v. Smith, 618 F. Supp. 1186, 1189 (S.D.N-Y. 1985)). Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the thorough and well-reasoned R&R. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to STRIKE Defendant Mangena’s answer, ECF No. 23, and to issue a certificate of default as to Mangena. SO ORDERED. Dated: November 8, 2024 New York, New York ANALISA TORRES United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Streets v. Mangena (Streets v. Mangena) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.