Streeter v. Jones
This text of 27 A.D.2d 794 (Streeter v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously modified on the law and facts by reducing the judgment to $1,500, dismissing the third cause of action and deleting the provision in the judgment for interest, and as modified, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Memorandum: When the court polled the jury as to its verdict on the first cause of action it unanimously affirmed that it found for the plaintiffs in the sum of $1,500. It was error to have rejected this verdict and to have required further deliberation on the first cause of action. Plaintiffs in this action for damages for defendant’s breach of his agreement to purchase real property are not entitled to any recovery for alleged rental loss as claimed in the third cause of action and defendant’s motion to dismiss this cause of action should have been granted. It was improper to have submitted this issue to the jury and its verdict of $675 on this cause of action should be set aside. The trial court awarded interest on the unpaid purchase money and the alleged rental value. This was erroneous and the interest so awarded should be stricken from the judgment. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe Trial Term, in favor of plaintiffs in an action for breach of contract.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Del Veeehio, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 A.D.2d 794, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/streeter-v-jones-nyappdiv-1967.