Street v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Street v. State

150 S.E. 435, 40 Ga. App. 552, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 642

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 13, 1929

Docket20006

StatusPublished

This text of 150 S.E. 435 (Street v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Street v. State, 150 S.E. 435, 40 Ga. App. 552, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 642 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The evidence connecting the accused with the offense charged, while weak and not altogether satisfactory, authorized his conviction, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial court, and no error of law appearing, this court is without authority to interefere with the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Luhe and Bloodworth, JJ., eoncur. Raymond Fierce, for plaintiff in error. Herbert Strickland, solicitor, W. G. Thomas, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

The evidence connecting the accused with the offense charged, while weak and not altogether satisfactory, authorized his conviction, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial court, and no error of law appearing, this court is without authority to interefere with the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Luhe and Bloodworth, JJ., eoncur. Raymond Fierce, for plaintiff in error. Herbert Strickland, solicitor, W. G. Thomas, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 S.E. 435, 40 Ga. App. 552, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/street-v-state-gactapp-1929.