Street v. State
This text of 176 S.E. 633 (Street v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mose Street was indicted for murder, and was found guilty. A motion for new trial was overruled, and tbe defendant excepted.
An accomplice is one who is present at the commission of the crime, aiding and abetting the perpetrator, or who could be convicted of such crime as an accessory before the fact. Kearce v. State, 178 Ga. 220 (2) (172 S. E. 643). In the instant case there is nothing in the evidence to show that either of the witnesses who were present at the commission of the crime actually participated therein, or was guilty as an accessory. Baker v. State, 121 Ga. 189 (2) (48 S. E. 967).
One of the witnesses for the State was jointly indicted with the defendant. This witness and two other witnesses were present at the time of the commission of the crime, but there was no evidence to show that they actually participated in the crime. Therefore an instruction on the law relating to the testimony of accomplices would have been improper. Walker v. State, 118 Ga. 757 (45 S. E. 608); Davis v. State, 122 Ga. 564 (50 S. E. 376).
Though there was some conflict in the testimony, the jury exercised its prerogative as to what they would believe to be the truth of the case. The trial judge, who was in the atmosphere of the ease, was satisfied; and the judgment overruling the motion for new trial will not be interfered with.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
176 S.E. 633, 179 Ga. 636, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/street-v-state-ga-1934.