Street v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Street v. State

616 So. 2d 641, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4734, 1993 WL 130954

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 28, 1993

DocketNo. 92-2750

StatusPublished

This text of 616 So. 2d 641 (Street v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Street v. State, 616 So. 2d 641, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4734, 1993 WL 130954 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm. There was not a timely and specific objection to the state’s technical failure to establish that certified judgments introduced into evidence constituted prior felony convictions of appellant. Thus, we find no merit in this point on appeal. See Johnson v. State, 478 So.2d 885 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), cause dismissed, 488 So.2d 830 (Fla.1986); see also Reed v. State, 603 So.2d 69 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Burrell v. State, 601 So.2d 628 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).

Assuming arguendo an objection was properly made, we also affirm the denial of appellant’s motion for mistrial based upon testimonial prejudice, finding that any such error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Di Guilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986)..

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD, HERSEY and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI