Street v. New Orleans, Fort Jackson & Grand Isle Railroad
This text of 43 La. Ann. 116 (Street v. New Orleans, Fort Jackson & Grand Isle Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
The defendant company constructed its road through plaintiff’s property under the impression that it was public land.
This suit is for damages for the entry upon the land, appropriating a portion of it, destroying timber and fencing thereon, and for the cost of additional fencing rendered necessary by cutting up the property of plaintiff. There are questions of fact only involved.
The evidence in the record does not justify a judgment for the de - preciation in the value of the property, or its damage for the obstruction of drainage by the construction of the road bed.
But the plaintiff is entitled to a j udgment for the value of the land appropriated as damages, as it has been rendered useless for agricultural purposes, and for the value of the timber destroyed, and the cost of the required amount of fencing made necessary by entering plaintiff’s property.
[117]*117The land, about eleven acres, is worth about $10 per acre. The two hundred cords of willow wood is worth about fifty cents a cord standing, and the additional fencing about $200. The judgment appealed from was for $400 in favor of the plaintiff.
It was justified by the evidence. We find no error in it.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
43 La. Ann. 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/street-v-new-orleans-fort-jackson-grand-isle-railroad-la-1891.