Street v. Clark
This text of 1 N.C. 15 (Street v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By
A certiorari ought not to issue where the party has another remedy: in this case another, and a more effectual one, is provided by law, against the injustice which he may receive, or even imagine, by the determination of the County Court.
Should they refuse an appeal, this court might properly interpose its authority; but it would be transgressing the bounds of its own jurisdiction, to deprive the County Court of theirs, and this too, without a sufficient ground: for it is certainly pressuming too much, upon the belief of a party concerned, that a court of justice can so far forget [16]*16the solemn sanctions under which it acts, and the high responsibility of its duties, as to be influenced in its decisions, by bad men combined to oppress an individual.
Of this action the County Court has, exclusively, original jurisdiction under the act of Assembly; and this ought first to be exercised, before the power of this Court commences; but in any case, a certiorari is improper before trial, where there is a right of appeal: unless, perhaps, in a case where the County Court assume a jurisdiction which does not belong to them. Rule discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 N.C. 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/street-v-clark-ncsuperct-1799.