Streeper v. Johnson

District of Columbia

Streeper v. Johnson

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia

DecidedFebruary 4, 2009

DocketCivil Action No. 2006-2065

StatusPublished

This text of Streeper v. Johnson (Streeper v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Streeper v. Johnson, (D.D.C. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

GERALD STREEPER, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 06-2065 (RMU) : v. : Document No.: 15 : JACLYN ANN JOHNSON, : : Defendant. :

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GRANTING THE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

On December 4, 2006, the plaintiff filed a complaint against the defendant in the above-

captioned matter alleging negligent operation of a vehicle. On August 8, 2008, the plaintiff filed

a motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability against the defendant. When the

defendant failed to oppose the motion, the court directed her to show cause on or before January

23, 2009, why the motion should not be granted as conceded. To date, the defendant has failed

to oppose the plaintiff’s motion or to show cause why the motion should not be granted.

Accordingly, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7(b), the court grants the plaintiff’s motion for partial

summary judgment. An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is separately and

contemporaneously issued this 4th day of February, 2009.

RICARDO M. URBINA United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI