Streb ex rel. Streb v. Sears Roebuck & Co.

341 So. 2d 1059
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 1, 1977·No. No. 75-1993·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs from an order dismissing their complaint. The complaint charged that the defendant, Sears Roebuck and Company, was liable in damages to plaintiffs for injuries suffered by the minor plaintiff when the trousers purchased from Sears by plaintiffs ignited while they were being worn by the minor.

Upon motion of the defendant, Sears, the trial court dismissed the complaint. The order stated no grounds for the dismissal. Application for leave to amend was heard and denied.

Upon consideration of the record on appeal, briefs and argument of counsel, we have concluded that the complaint did not wholly fail to state a cause of action upon which relief could be granted. Therefore, the court erred in dismissing the complaint.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Streb ex rel. Streb v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 341 So. 2d 1059 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

341 So. 2d 1059 (Streb ex rel. Streb v. Sears Roebuck & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Salinetro v. Nystrom
341 So. 2d 1059 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)