Streater v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Streater v. State

1912 OK CR 98, 120 P. 1134, 6 Okla. Crim. 736, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 351

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 27, 1912

DocketNo. A-1241.

StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK CR 98 (Streater v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Streater v. State, 1912 OK CR 98, 120 P. 1134, 6 Okla. Crim. 736, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 351 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted at the March, 1911, term of the county court of Seminole county on a charge of having the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell the same, and his punishment fixed at a fine of fifty dollars and confinement in the county, jail for a period of thirty days. We have, carefully examined the record and find that -the accused had a fair and impartial trial In every particular. The instructions of the court were as favorable as the law justifies. Binding no error in the record to prejudice the substantial rights of the plaintiff in error the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted at the March, 1911, term of the county court of Seminole county on a charge of having the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell the same, and his punishment fixed at a fine of fifty dollars and confinement in the county, jail for a period of thirty days. We have, carefully examined the record and find that -the accused had a fair and impartial trial In every particular. The instructions of the court were as favorable as the law justifies. Binding no error in the record to prejudice the substantial rights of the plaintiff in error the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK CR 98, 120 P. 1134, 6 Okla. Crim. 736, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/streater-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.